Re: Revised LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)
Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes:
> Frank Mittelbach <email@example.com> writes:
> > for the sake of an argument, what about
> > 1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message
> > that it isn't the original package
> > 2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be
> > used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages
> > without making any other processing changes, you must use that.
> > i don't think the wording is good, but that aside, would that lift your
> > concern?
> I'd prefer just saying that the documentation must make clear what the
> provenance is.
I take this as a yes, though you do not like it, correct?