[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Revised LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)

Thomas Bushnell, BSG writes:
 > Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach@latex-project.org> writes:
 > > for the sake of an argument, what about 
 > > 
 > >  1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message
 > >     that it isn't the original package
 > >  
 > >  2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be
 > >     used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages
 > >     without making any other processing changes, you must use that.
 > > 
 > > i don't think the wording is good, but that aside, would that lift your
 > > concern?
 > I'd prefer just saying that the documentation must make clear what the
 > provenance is.

I take this as a yes, though you do not like it, correct?

Reply to: