Re: Revised LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)
Frank Mittelbach writes:
> for the sake of an argument, what about
> 1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message
> that it isn't the original package
> 2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be
> used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages
> without making any other processing changes, you must use that.
> i don't think the wording is good, but that aside, would that lift your
as a ps: i already suggested yesterday:
it it helps one could probably make that even more explicit in 5.a.2 by
adding something like explicitly restricts it to facilities those only
functions are to pass information to the user.
/it it/if it/s