Re: Revised LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL)
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Henning Makholm wrote:
> AFAIU, what the authors of the LPPL draft is trying to express is
> nothing more or less than
> 1. You must make your modified package output to the screen a message
> that it isn't Standard LaTeX.
Would it be possible to use GPL wording for this? The ability NOT to do
this when written for non-interactive use is important.
> 2. If the environment where your modified package is intended to be
> used provides a documented standard way of emitting such messages
> to the screen, you must use that.
I'll need more thought about this. A requirement to use a specified
facility seems unfree to me at first sniff, but I could (yet again) be
reading too much into it.
Mark Rafn email@example.com <http://www.dagon.net/>