On Mon, 03 Mar 2003, Matt Brubeck wrote: > In the US, "Edicts of government, such as judicial opinions, adminis- > trative rulings, legislative enactments, public ordinances, and > similar official legal documents are not copyrightable for reasons of > public policy" (Copyright Office Practices Compendium II section > 206.01). It is important to note though, that contracts are not edicts of government. [Nor (unless I am severly mistaken) is the Copyright Office Practices Compendium law in any sense of the word.] This manual, intended primarily for Copyright Office staff, is a general guide to practices and procedures.[1] > The Supreme Court recently accepted a case that may clarify the > extent of this exception (Veeck v. SBCCI): > > http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=630 Unless SCOTUS does something remarkable, it is unlikely that their ruling (if they claim the codes to be uncopyrightable) will extend beyond the codes themselves. > I have also heard the claim that private contracts are not > copyrightable, but I've never seen law or precendent to support it. That has been my general experience as well, although I have never researched it thoroughly. I presume the Veeck case will provide some more insight as to their status. Don Armstrong 1: http://www.copyright.gov/compendium/ -- She was alot like starbucks. IE, generic and expensive. -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/batch3.htm http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Attachment:
pgp8OIdL6QsPg.pgp
Description: PGP signature