On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:20:39PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > Yes, thought so, since the GPL only applies on redistribution, not on > something you do in-house. > But i think it would be fine to have the exemption and the > redistribution rights of the proprietary .o nonethless. If the exemption is not needed, it's better to *not* have it, since any exemption weakens the GPL to some extent. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpUMjCefmv5h.pgp
Description: PGP signature