[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#153257: TeX Licenses & teTeX (Was: Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia)



On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 09:53:20AM -0600, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 09:33:37AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I repeat: the file renaming requirement is not DFSG-free, and you
> > wanting it to be so will not make it so.  DFSG 4 does not permit it.
> 
>   4. Integrity of The Author's Source Code
> 
>      The license may restrict source-code from being distributed in
>      modified form _only if the license allows the distribution of
>      "patch files" with the source code for the purpose of modifying
>      the program at build time.  The license must explicitly permit
>      distribution of software built from modified source code.
>      *** The license may require derived works to carry a different
>      name or version number from the original software. ***
>      (This is a compromise. The Debian group encourages all authors to
>      not restrict any files, source or binary, from being modified.)
> 
> Note the ***...*** section.

The license may require derived *** works *** to carry a different name
or version number from the original software.

Note the ***...*** section.

A filename is not the name of a work any more than an MD5 checksum is.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     Human beings rarely imagine a god
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     that behaves any better than a
branden@debian.org                 |     spoiled child.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Robert Heinlein

Attachment: pgpLcg3Hj0kXY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: