On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 06:18:08PM -0700, Mark Rafn wrote: > I read Branden's message as not wanting to put Debian's name on a license > unless it is adequately and unambiguously free, and therefore always meets > the DFSG, not that he wants to work around some flaw in the DFSG. > > The DFSG defines the spirit of the license we're looking for. A license > needs to be found/created that fits it, rather than modifying the DFSG to > fit some license. Yup, that's what I meant. Thanks, Mark. That said, it is true that I don't think the DFSG is a perfect document as is. However, because I've volunteered to draft the DFCL, you can be sure that I will attempt to write in such a way that it complies with my Ideal DFSG as well as the one we're actually using. :) -- G. Branden Robinson | When I die I want to go peacefully Debian GNU/Linux | in my sleep like my ol' Grand branden@debian.org | Dad...not screaming in terror like http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | his passengers.
Attachment:
pgpwvI0I_FrUE.pgp
Description: PGP signature