Re: [aspell-devel] Problems with aspell-en license
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 03:23:45PM -0400, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> I am merely quoting the closest thing to a copyright notice for all of the
> wordlist as generally required by copyright law. RMS basically said the
> word list meets FSF definition of Free (which should in term meet Debian
Meeting the FSF's definition of "free" does not always imply meeting
Debian's definition of "free", although they usually coincide.
> That should be all that you need to know.
Even if it was true, it still wouldn't necessarily be sufficient to
*convince* him (and d-legal) that it's correct.
> If you want I
> can add a note that all word lists used are FSF Free to the copyright
If a license clarification is needed, I don't believe this will help.