Re: BSD license, core libraries, and NetBSD

[Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>]

Scripsit Joel Baker <lucifer@lightbearer.com>

> 2) I assert that NetBSD's libc, while under a 4-clause license, qualifies
> under the GPL clause exempting system libraries from the linking
> limitations (that nailed OpenSSL and others).

Which part of "unless that component itself accompanies the
executable" don't you understand?

> > What is the fourth clause of the license you're referring to?

> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html has an example of the clause in
> question.

The clause quoted there has the number 3 attached to it. Again: What
is the fourth clause of the license you're referring to? Or is there a
zeroth clause?

-- 
Henning Makholm                             "Det er du nok fandens ene om at
                                         mene. For det ligger i Australien!"