Re: Bug#143063 acknowledged by developer (Bug#143063: fixed in mmix 1:0.0.20020615-3)
Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca> writes:
> It has been argued (during the LaTeX license debate) that "the license
> may require derived works to carry a different name" refers to the
> software or package name, and not a functional item such as a source
> code filename (which makes modification much more difficult).
Not quite right. If only a source code filename were implicated, that
would not be a problem. It's restrictions on what gets *installed*
that is the problem.