Re: BSD & GPL / deb with 2 licenses?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Prepare for armageddon, we agree...:)
On 16 Sep 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:
>
>> The BSD Daemon is under the license at
>> http://www.mckusick.com/beastie/mainpage/copyright.html
>>
>> The big problem there is that the grant is only to individuals for
>> personal use. I'd assume that any other use has to be negotiated with
>> McKusick himself. DFSG free? I can't feature any scenario in which it
>> would be: the main license discriminates against groups, and any other
>> licensing would be Debian-specific.
>
>We should remove it; it's not DFSG.
>
>For future reference, Kirk's policy is pretty liberal. The
>individuals for personal use grant is above. His policy for other
>uses is:
>
>1) He gets one of whatever the logo is on (t-shirt, whatever), and
>2) He has to judge it to be in good taste.
>
>For example, he told me he would not be happy with a herd of gnus
>chasing down a terrified BSD daemon, but a BSD daemon and a Gnu
>shaking hands would be just fine.
>
>Thomas
>
- --
Be Careful! I have a black belt in sna-fu!
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQE9h36v+ZSKG3nWr3ARApf5AKCN+k6hKDus6wRxd1jqfTEzHAZUuQCghrf/
uAORxUxPlQBSWyfmYPymFY4=
=SW5B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: