On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 15:27, Andrew Suffield wrote: > Here is the complete text of the 'license' for eawpats, such as it is: [...] > I couldn't remember which ones were > covered by this, so I just flatly said that the whole set was for > non-commercial use only. Since then, I have extracted the *.txt and read*.* > files out of all the archives and grep'd them for "commercial". [...] Those sentences worry me. Media companies tend to be rather litigious --- if you've ever been on the bad side of the company who made the Gravis patch set, you'll know this. We have to be *absolutely sure* that the patches are free or we'll be asking for trouble... -- +- David Given --McQ-+ Did you hear about the hard-working but ill sage | dg@cowlark.com | who got cursed with garlic breath? He was a | (dg@tao-group.com) | super-calloused fragile mystic hexed with +- www.cowlark.com --+ halitosis.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part