Re: Knuth statement on renaming cm files and Licence violation.
email@example.com (Brian Sniffen) wrote on 04.09.02 in <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Bear in mind, Russ, nobody is questioning whether TeX (or LaTeX) are
> *good* software, or *useful* software, or even *open source* software.
> The question is whether they are free software.
Statements like this really piss me off.
Open source software *is* free software, by definition, without exception.
In fact, given that "open source" is the same as "DFSG free",
then if anything is not DFSG free then it's not open source, either.