On 02 Sep 2002 01:33:54 -0700 tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) wrote: > David B Harris <eelf@sympatico.ca> writes: > > > This probably just means that if they want to go after somebody, > > they have to go after the person who posted the message and seek > > damages. > > What possible damages? In the United States, at least, you are > allowed to say the truth. I know that in the UK and some other > countries truth is not a defense to libel. > > In this case, it isn't even defamatory. What possible damages? > > Geez. Spam sucks, but don't let avoiding spam contort every other > action in your life. Never said they'd actually be able to pull it off ;) Just saying that, in the best of circumstances, that's probably their only avenue.
Attachment:
pgpQwpbu5Y2Ed.pgp
Description: PGP signature