[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DFSG 4

On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 18:18, Branden Robinson wrote:

> Is there, in fact, any other software that would need to be pulled from
> main if DSFG 4 were eliminated and DFSG 3 rewritten as follows [...]

I'm trying to answer that, but I've just found that Policy 13.6 is
violated by quite a few packages (e.g., under GPL but includes neither
GPL nor reference to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL in copyright file.)

Ugh. Time to point this out on -devel, I guess.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: