[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: GPL-script to be run on a non-free interpreter

To take Chris Lawrence's post a step further, what is the difference between
having a pound-bang line for a non-free interpreter and executing a GPL binary
on a closed source system?  It is permissible for libc to be non-free and a
program to use it.  The closed system's kernel is for all intents and purposes
an interpreter.

I think this is simply ideology getting in the way.

Reply to: