[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Concluding the LPPL debate, try 2

On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 11:58, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 16:36, Henning Makholm wrote:
> >    "If you want to modify a package [say, one that is not part of the
> >    core LaTeX distribution, but one whose author has independently
> >    put it under the LPPL], you must either
> >      1) [do the renaming stuff], or
> >      2) make sure that your modified package refuses to run on top of
> >         the standard LaTeX kernel."
> > 
> > If this is correct, I don't think that option (2) is not a free
> > option.
> The main thing to consider...

Sorry for the extra followup, but it just struck me that I might have
misparsed this.  Are you saying that you think option 2 is DFSG-free?

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: