[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia

On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 17:25, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 05:11:07PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> > Requiring a binary file rename is also OK; I think we might even do this
> > now.
> Is it?  Would you consider fileutils free under such a license?
> (You can change "ls" all you want as long as you rename the binary)

Sure, why not?

I used this very example, and thought that Mark Rafn's rebuttal was
persuasive; see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00153.html and the responses for details.

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: