Re: forwarded message from Jeff Licquia
On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 17:25, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 05:11:07PM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> > Requiring a binary file rename is also OK; I think we might even do this
> > now.
> Is it? Would you consider fileutils free under such a license?
> (You can change "ls" all you want as long as you rename the binary)
Sure, why not?
I used this very example, and thought that Mark Rafn's rebuttal was
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200207/msg00153.html and the responses for details.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org