Re: distributable but non-free documents
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 16:45, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Jules Bean <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > 1b) Debian makes a moral stand on free software. Not free licenses,
> > or free books, or free tea, or free beer, or free-for-all wrestling,
> > with all their various meanings of free.
> While some might think free beer is essential to free software, they
> would be deluded.
> However, free documentation *is* essential to free software.
If I recall, the original issue was about some RFC documents. I would
have thought it was essential that such things, which define the
standards we all use, should be protected from unauthorised amendments.
Or do you want Microsoft to issue new versions?...
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
"Give, and it will be given to you. A good measure,
pressed down, taken together and running over,
will be poured into your lap. For with the same
measure that you use, it will be measured to
you." Luke 6:38