Re: Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:46:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020214184607.GH7139@kukkaruukku.keltti.jyu.fi>
Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020214182905.GI26730@zork.net>
References: <[🔎] 1013556092.31170.380.camel@gargantubrain> <[🔎] 20020213.133738.59461990.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <[🔎] 20020214180048.GD7139@kukkaruukku.keltti.jyu.fi> <[🔎] 20020214182905.GI26730@zork.net>

On 20020214T102905-0800, Nick Moffitt wrote:
> 	Or a written offer, good for three years. 

Yes, and that's a greater nuisance IMO.

-- 
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, LuK (BSc)    * http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ * gaia@iki.fi

Reply to:

References:
- Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft
  - From: Stephen Ryan <stephen.p.ryan@dartmouth.edu>
- Re: Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft
  - From: Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu>
- Re: Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft
  - From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <gaia@iki.fi>
- Re: Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft
  - From: Nick Moffitt <nick@zork.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft
Next by Date: Re: Bug#131997 acknowledged by developer (Bug#131997: fixed in glut 3.7-12)
Previous by thread: Re: Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft
Next by thread: Re: Problems in GNU FDL 1.2 Draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread