Re: license requirements for a book to be in free section
On Tuesday, January 29, 2002, at 03:56 PM, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Extending it to absolute urls
would probably work, but has the serious problem that you can
only point to
one mirror, and not let the user choose, so I don't like that at all.
Leave it as a relative URL (or is it just package name, don't
remember), and then let apt-get pick the mirror of its choice.
Add a marker to these locations, like main: or non-us: (others
like contrib: and non-free: would work too, but FSF wouldn't
FSF would list, for example:
whatever <local name>
I haven't actually checked what the proper format for a packages
file is, but that should get the point across.
We'd just have to worry about old versions of packages.