Re: Cactvs-license
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:02:02PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> This is part of my distribution agreement with the
> university - I am not allowed to distribute the software to
> companies without a fee (which mainly goes to the university, and
> must be priced comparable to other commercial software).
> The univ. considers itself to be a copyright holder, and this
> was the only way to get any distribution rights."
>
> He didn't answer the non-free question yet, though.
Huh? That's an answer to the non-free question, right there.
--
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg
Reply to: