Re: {debian-legal} Re: Final Draft: Interpretive Guideline regarding DFSG clause 3
Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
> Uh, it's the program you've chosen to use; it's no one else's
> responsibility to make it match list policy. And hell, we've even gone
> out of our way to use a standard header to make this easy for you.
It's not a standard header. But, hey, if the proponents of this
header care so much about it, they should offer to support it.
> I repeat: why do you think there's some "(Unless it's too much effort)"
> rider?
Because I just don't claim perfection.
> The question isn't installing two packages (people already do that for
> apache and apache-doc, eg), it's about working out that emacs' docs are
> in a package called "emacs21-doc" versus "debian-political".
So, what's the problem? Or is the question about whether the docs are
in "main" or not?
Reply to: