Re: Final Draft: Interpretive Guideline regarding DFSG clause 3
Henning Makholm said:
> Scripsit Jeremy Hankins <email@example.com>
> > This is what non-free is for, right? How is including the emacs
> > docs "cuz we need it" different from including netscape back whene
> > there weren't any free alternatives?
> The emacs docs are ... docs. Netscape is/was, or at least purports to
> be, a program.
So? I'm not sure what distinction you're making here. If you're saying
that we should apply a different standard to docs than programs, then,
well, that's kind of the whole issue.
Jeremy Hankins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03