[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LDP in main?

On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 06:46:43PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> The smoke you are making up is the smoke that a test calling for
> judgment is one that Debian developers are somehow to stoopid or
> fulish to be able to implement well.

Ah, thanks; it's always good to get the false accusations straight from
the horse's mouth.

By the way,

Message-ID: <[🔎] 20011202075756.GD26052@deadbeast.net>
"Whether certain language is legally binding or not is always a
determination that will have to be made by a human."

Message-ID: <[🔎] 20011203044436.GB30855@deadbeast.net>
"See how much invariant text there is.  If there's more than
a certain amount, decide whether you still think the package should be
in the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution, and if so, raise the issue on
debian-legal so that the judgement of several people can applied."

These types of judgements in the first case demand a degree of
specialized knowledge, and in the second case a value judgement on the
part of the prospective package maintainer.  Thus I think my proposal is
expecting both informed and prudent decisions on the part of package

Let me know if that's setting the bar too high.

G. Branden Robinson                |    If a man ate a pound of pasta and a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    pound of antipasto, would they
branden@debian.org                 |    cancel out, leaving him still
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    hungry?              -- Scott Adams

Attachment: pgpxTVHAX1ruh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: