Re: FWD: Bug#121916: analog should be in non-free
>>>>> "Joey" == Joey Hess <email@example.com> writes:
Joey> Moving on to the other objection, does "you may not charge
Joey> for the program itself, only for reasonable costs of
Joey> distributing the program" violate the DFSG? The DFSG
Joey> requires that a program's license not prevent sale of an
Joey> aggregate of software that includes that program. It doesn't
Joey> require that the program be salable alone, just in
Joey> combination with other software.
I think I want this clause to end up being against the DFSG. However
I don't really want to have that argument as others are doing it.
Can't you just modify the program in some way and make the issue