Re: PROPOSED: interpretive guidelines regarding DFSG 3, modifiability, and invariant text
- To: email@example.com
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: PROPOSED: interpretive guidelines regarding DFSG 3, modifiability, and invariant text
- From: Richard Stallman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 03:24:00 -0700 (MST)
- Message-id: <[🔎] 200112011024.fB1AO0o18291@aztec.santafe.edu>
- Reply-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <20011130132226.A30821@deadbeast.net> (message from Branden Robinson on Fri, 30 Nov 2001 13:22:26 -0500)
- References: <20011127155358.B14227@deadbeast.net> <20011127211258.K1895@dtype.org> <20011127163331.A14420@deadbeast.net> <200111290041.fAT0f0k16740@aztec.santafe.edu> <20011128231042.C19204@deadbeast.net> <200111291917.fATJHru17234@aztec.santafe.edu> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <200111301701.fAUH1RV17696@aztec.santafe.edu> <20011130132226.A30821@deadbeast.net>
I think Henning was referring to the case where one wants to use small
portions of a GNU Manual verbatim.
This is not a very serious issue, since it isn't hard to rewrite a
small amount of text. You can also refer to it with a hypertext link
instead of copying it.
I don't think there is a real problem here. It may bother your
sensibilities because of the opinions that you start with, but practically
speaking it is easy to cope with.