Re: GFDL is a DFSG-compliant license
Sunnanvind Briling <email@example.com> writes:
> One of the issues is, very roughly:
> Should the DFSG be amended so that it can't be misinterpreted in the
> above way? The world is, after all, absurd.
No, not really. There is no way to amend the DFSG so that it requires
neither judgment nor understanding. Rather, the DFSG will always
require knowledgeable application.
The present discussion is very useful at giving us the common
knowledge about how we can apply it correctly to things using the
GFDL. But it isn't necessary for us to go mucking with the DFSG in
order to spell out the conclusions we come too.