Re: Bug#118427: TP: epo -- Miner mode to reduce the labour to edit code
Raul Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 09:16:19AM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > Raul, why are you so quick to dismiss this? You state it like it
> > was a matter of fact. Is this documented anywhere?
> I didn't dismiss it.
I guess I misread the end of your post.
> [And, what is it that you want documentation on?]
I meant like a blurb in Emacs etc/ directory or something,
stating whether this was okay.
> Anyways: it's legal for elisp code to have a GPL-incompatible license.
> However, it's not legal to distribute GPLed emacs with such code if that
> code is intended to be used with emacs to implement some program.
If any non-trivial code makes a call to an Emacs function, even
say 'buffer-substring', then do we consider that loaded code a
GPL'ed library? I guess that's the question.