On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 01:05:30PM +0900, Takashi Okamoto wrote: > Above license closes DFSG. But it restricts redistributing modified code. > Therefore epo should go to non-free section. Is it even legal for elisp code to have a GPL-incompatible license? Any elisp code uses the emacs builtin functions extensively. These are protected by the GPL. The concept of linking gets very blurry here, too.