Re: Group Copyright

[John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>]

On 20 Jul 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:

>John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:
>
>> On 20 Jul 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>>
>> >John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:
>> >
>> >> If the fiction that a corporation has rights as a person is granted, it
>> >> only follows that the next step in the progression is that unincorporated
>> >> groups start to get the same rights.  It's as screwed up as a football
>> >> bat, but that's never stopped the .gov before.  However, the worst case is
>> >> that this makes the copyright a pseudonymous work, subject to the
>> >> copyright laws thereon, which still means that infringement isn't the
>> >> smartest thing to do...:)
>> >
>> >Can you *please* leave out the Randroid political commentary?
>>
>> When you leave out the stumping for the FSF.
>
>Free software politics is appropriate on Debian lists (at least,
>relevant Debian lists).  Complaining about the details of American
>corporation law is not.  Random slams on government is not.

I assume of course that you have cites on this?  Please provide them.

-- 
Here is wisdom.  Let him that hath wisdom count the number of the BSD: for
it is the number of a man; and his number is VI VI VI.
(ir-reve-rent-lations 13:17-19)
Who is John Galt?  galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!