Re: Group Copyright
On 20 Jul 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>John Galt <email@example.com> writes:
>> On 20 Jul 2001, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
>> >John Galt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> >> If the fiction that a corporation has rights as a person is granted, it
>> >> only follows that the next step in the progression is that unincorporated
>> >> groups start to get the same rights. It's as screwed up as a football
>> >> bat, but that's never stopped the .gov before. However, the worst case is
>> >> that this makes the copyright a pseudonymous work, subject to the
>> >> copyright laws thereon, which still means that infringement isn't the
>> >> smartest thing to do...:)
>> >Can you *please* leave out the Randroid political commentary?
>> When you leave out the stumping for the FSF.
>Free software politics is appropriate on Debian lists (at least,
>relevant Debian lists). Complaining about the details of American
>corporation law is not. Random slams on government is not.
I assume of course that you have cites on this? Please provide them.
Here is wisdom. Let him that hath wisdom count the number of the BSD: for
it is the number of a man; and his number is VI VI VI.
Who is John Galt? email@example.com, that's who!