Re: Group Copyright
John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu> writes:
> If the fiction that a corporation has rights as a person is granted, it
> only follows that the next step in the progression is that unincorporated
> groups start to get the same rights. It's as screwed up as a football
> bat, but that's never stopped the .gov before. However, the worst case is
> that this makes the copyright a pseudonymous work, subject to the
> copyright laws thereon, which still means that infringement isn't the
> smartest thing to do...:)
Can you *please* leave out the Randroid political commentary?
Reply to: