On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 08:59:55PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > Just a small point that has only a small relevance to your point
> > (which, again, I am taking no position on): John Galt is not
> > anonymous, but pseudonymous.
> The problem here is that he can, at a moment's notice, decide that he
> has so spoiled the name "John Galt" that he picks up another. And we
> have no way, indeed, of knowing how many times he's done that before.
Guys, this is completely off topic. Killfile him if you want. Ignore him
if you want. Treat him with respect and courtesy if you want. But geez,
stop stressing about it.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpauVrU2jOf9.pgp
Description: PGP signature