On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 09:45:35PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> Now, there is yet another exception for GPL-compatible programs,
> saying the modification restrictions don't apply. Can one argue that
> this is simply dual-licensing? Or a special usage restriction ("you
> may only compress GPL-compatable data with UPX" sounds like "you may
> only use <certain data> with <foo program>")?
Blah, it's more like a linking restriction. Sorry.