[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: FilterProxy and DFSG-compliancy?

On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 10:59:44PM +0100, Kenneth Vestergaard Schmidt wrote:
> I have attached LICENSE to this post - hope nobody minds, it's only 3.6kb. I
> really need some input on this - would it be against the DFSG? I wouldn't
> think so, only the long description should contain the license, and
> README.Debian should probably contain a notice. But should it go in non-free?
> Or is it totally against the DFSG?

What do you mean "totally against the DFSG"? If it's in non-free, it's 
against the DFSG. 
> I am quite serious about this.  In case that wasn't clear, you may not
> do the following things with FilterProxy:
>     Remove naughty words
>     Remove pornography
>     Remove "harmful ideas" in any form
>     Enforce access policies.
> *UNLESS* you have the express knowledge and consent of the person whose
> web content is being filtered.  Said person must know exactly what is
> being filtered.  This is just so that unscrupulous individuals don't
> install FilterProxy as a netnanny-type filtering system, and force their
> views on others using it.

It's been said on debian-devel, but I'll say it again: non-free. This 
goes against the fields of endavour clause; it's not a matter of 
whether we approve of the use or not. (IMO, it sucks; if you want to
remove pornongraphy from stuff coming into your system, you should
be able to, and your kids or employees can deal.)

David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
Pointless website: http://dvdeug.dhis.org
"I don't care if Bill personally has my name and reads my email and 
laughs at me. In fact, I'd be rather honored." - Joseph_Greg

Reply to: