Re: Python 2.0

[An Thi-Nguyen Le <anle@ews.uiuc.edu>]

[Gregor Hoffleit - Mon, 11 Dec 2000 12:31:16 PM CST]
> The license is fine and DFSG free (therefore there will a package in main
> soon), the problem is clause 6, where they state "This License Agreement
> shall be governed by and interpreted in all respects by the law of the State
> of California, excluding conflict of law provisions." This is not compatible
> with the GPL (at least according to RMS and his lawyer).

I thought that RMS's lawyers and Guido (and possibly his lawyers...) had 
talked over the license and were going to change it to be non-conflicting.
Did that never happen, break down... or?...


-- 
An Thi-Nguyen Le
|Zounds!  I was never so bethumped with words
|since I first called my brother's father dad.
|		-- William Shakespeare, "Kind John"