Re: Source code with no (explicit) licence

[David Starner <dvdeug@x8b4e516e.dhcp.okstate.edu>]

On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:49:41AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> It's also my understanding that, strictly speaking, all rights to a
> copyrighted work remain with the author unless otherwise provided.  So,
> one might argue that a copyrighted source tarball with no licence
> wording is unlicenced, proprietary code.

s/strictly speaking//g; s/one might argue that//g;

There's no legal question here, no arguments; that's what the
law says.

-- 
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
http://dvdeug.dhis.org
If you wish to strive for peace of soul then believe; 
if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire.
   -- Friedrich Nietzsche