Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 15:24:19 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000917152419.D23342@kitenet.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000916161402.E27797@deadbeast.net>; from branden@debian.org on Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 04:14:02PM -0500
References: <[🔎] 968982538.ecf6bd08@debian.org> <[🔎] Pine.SOL.4.02.10009150527430.9836-100000@lennon.csufresno.edu> <[🔎] 20000916161402.E27797@deadbeast.net>

Branden Robinson wrote:
> Look up "tort" in a legal dictionary.

Who gave this man a legal dictionary?

-- 
see shy jo

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

References:
- Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
  - From: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
- Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
  - From: Steve M Bibayoff <smb23@csufresno.edu>
- Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

Prev by Date: 2 questions about leocad
Next by Date: Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
Previous by thread: Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
Next by thread: Re: FWD: Analog licence violates DFSG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread