Re: Free Pine?
Scripsit Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>
> Then why do we have DSFG #8 `License Must Not Be Specific to Debian'
> if there is no Debian?
There *is* a Debian. But it's not a legal *person*, it's a *work*.
It is possible to write up a license that says, for example, that
copies of program X may be sold for monetary gain only as long as
it is sold together with an entire official Debian diskset or an
entire snapshot of the FTP archive.
Such a license would fail #8 because it is specific to the work
Henning Makholm "Need facts -- *first*. Then
the dialysis -- the *analysis*."