[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Python 1.5.2 licensing (long)

On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Henry Jones wrote:

> I argue that Debian needs to clarify
> immediately with copyright holder CNRI the
> licensing of Python 1.5.2--whether CNRI
> considers the 1.5.2 license to be valid and
> whether CNRI intends for 1.5.2 to be
> distributed with that license.

I disagree. Whether CNRI thinks the license is invalid is irrelevant: the
question is whether Debian thinks the license is valid.
For the record, Guido has stated numerous times that BeOpen's lawyer's
proffessional opinion is that the license *is* valid.

Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il>
There is no IGLU cabal.

Reply to: