Re: Python 1.5.2 licensing (long)
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Henry Jones wrote:
> I argue that Debian needs to clarify
> immediately with copyright holder CNRI the
> licensing of Python 1.5.2--whether CNRI
> considers the 1.5.2 license to be valid and
> whether CNRI intends for 1.5.2 to be
> distributed with that license.
I disagree. Whether CNRI thinks the license is invalid is irrelevant: the
question is whether Debian thinks the license is valid.
For the record, Guido has stated numerous times that BeOpen's lawyer's
proffessional opinion is that the license *is* valid.
Moshe Zadka <email@example.com>
There is no IGLU cabal.