Re: mixmaster license

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>]

On Tue, 9 May 2000, Peter Palfrader wrote:

>...
> One part that I don't like about the new license[1] is the following
> paragraph (1.b.iii):
> 
>     [you may modify and distribute the source only iff you]
>        provide Anonymizer Inc. with a copy of the Source Code of
>        such modifications or work by electronic mail, and grant
>        Anonymizer Inc. a perpetual, royalty-free license to use and
>        distribute the modifications or work in its products.
> 
> Am I correct to assume that this would make the package go into
> non-free?

I think this is DFSG-free and can go to main.

> TIA
> 					yours,
> 					peter

cu,
Adrian

-- 
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
                -- Mahatma Ghandi