bruce@perens.com wrote: > Agreed, it's not DFSG-compliant as it stands. I don't think they really mean > it to be, they just worded it badly. Want to talk with them? I've fired off a letter, but all the addressed I have access to are 10 years old and bounced. If anyone wants to track this down, be my guest, I've moved it to non-free in the meantime. -- see shy jo