Re: Bug#37599: jdk1.1: no permission to distribute
>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl> writes:
Richard> Package: jdk1.1 Version: 1.1.7v1a-2 Severity: grave
Richard> According to its license, we're not allowed to distribute
Richard> this package at all: (caps mine)
Richard> 1. Limited License Grant. Sun grants to you ("Licensee")
Richard> a non-exclusive, non-transferable limited license to use
Richard> the Software without fee for evaluation of the Software
Richard> and for development of Java(tm) compatible applets and
Richard> applications. Licensee may make one archival copy of the
Richard> Software and may re-distribute complete, unmodified
Richard> copies of the Software to software developers within
Richard> Licensee's organization to avoid unnecessary download
Richard> time, provided that this License conspicuously appear
Richard> with all copies of the Software. Except for the
Richard> foregoing, LICENSEE MAY NOT RE-DISTRIBUTE THE SOFTWARE IN
Richard> WHOLE OR IN PART, either separately or included with a
Richard> product. Refer to the Java Runtime Environment Version
Richard> 1.1.7 binary code license
Richard> (http://java.sun.com/products/JDK/1.1/index.html) for the
Richard> availability of runtime code which may be distributed
Richard> with Java compatible applets and applications.
However, the
JDK Version 1.1.x Internal Noncommercial Use Source License1 of 4
Nov 10, 1998
which I have signed states, in part
1.2 Sun grants to Licensee the royalty-free right to distribute
binary code developed and compiled from the Licensed Software in
accordance with Subsection 1.1 above ("Derived Binaries"), provided
that: (i) Derived Binaries are not integrated, bundled, combined or
associated in any way with a product, (ii) there is no charge
associated with such distribution, (iii) Derived Binaries are fully
compatible with the then-current version of the publicly available
test suite supplied by Sun which verifies Java compatibility
("JavaTest Suite") and must remain compatible with subsequent
versions of the JavaTest Suites and upgraded Licensed Software, and
(iv) Derived Binaries are distributed subject to a license agreement
containing terms and conditions at least as protective of Sun as
those included in the binary code license used by Sun for internet
distribution of the Java binaries. In the event that Licensee
desires that such distribution be fee-based, or be associated with a
product, Licensee must execute a commercial license agreement with
Sun.
Therefore, such binaries as I produce may be legitimately distributed
in non-free, as they have been for some time. If you would prefer to
have the source licence added to the package, I'm happy to do that.
--
Stephen
---
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. - Bruce Schneier
Reply to: