[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being

On 14 Dec 1999, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:

> The owner hasn't gotten any "consideration", and therefore he hasn't
> bound himself by contract, so the copier can't sue the owner.  But so
> what?

Can't the owner, since he hasn't bound himself by the promise, change
his mind and revoke his promise, threatening to sue the copier if he
does not stop copying?

Henning Makholm

Reply to: