[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: freedomization task list [was: Re: Dangerous precedent being

William T Wilson <fluffy@snurgle.org> writes:

> This is a very interesting thought.  What if you reverse it?  The *author*
> of the software receives no consideration from the person the software is
> distributed to.  I am suddenly very afraid of this.

Yes, and that means that the copier cannot sue the author.  So what?
In what scenario do you think the copier should be allowed to sue the

Reply to: