Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
Caspian wrote:
> In most cases, I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that those who "buy" modern
> commercial GNU/Linux dists (which are often laced with tons of non-free
> code, usually-- as in the case of Red Hat-- completely unsegregated from
> free code, and often part of the base system)
99.9% FUD. Red Hat includes exactly one non-free component that I know of:
netscape. They're doing a lot better now than they were 2 years ago. (Though
I still don't condone them weaseling netscape in there.)
--
see shy jo
Reply to: