[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mutt no longer in non-us?

Chris Lawrence wrote:
> It highly inconveniences our users, however.  No part of the Social
> Contract says "protesting stupid laws is more important than our users."

How does it inconvencience our users?

> It also inconveniences the Debian maintainer, who has to maintain two
> different forks of the same code (source and binary).  It wastes space
> on our mirrors.  It creates confusion by having multiple packages that
> do the exact same thing (less a system() or two).

What are you talking about? Both source and binary would go in non-US.

see shy jo

Reply to: