Re: IBM public license
Henning Makholm wrote:
> > Hmm, but it does not say "it must be made available _solely_ under
> > this Agreement".
> An interesting word game, but I think that a permission to relicense
> a work under arbitrary terms needs to be a little more explicit than
Well... you don't _need_ permission to relicense. If a license allows
redistribution, then by default you can redistribute under whatever
terms you like. A license is a contract, not a property of the software.
> > If the licenses are compatible in the first place,
> What do you mean, precisely, by that?
That the terms of the GPL do not conflict with the requirements the IPL
places on redistribution.