Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: ldp-nag_1.0-1_i386.changes REJECTED]
John Hasler wrote:
> Andrea Fanfani writes:
> > ok this the answer for the package of network admis guide (under LDP
> > licence), please can we decide a definitive point of view about this
> > licence :-))
> You already have my opinion, but of course it isn't binding on anyone.
Hmm, I don't have it. I see only two mails about the ldp-nag license
(prior to this exchange), and neither is from you. Can you repeat it?