Re: Recently released QPL
Joseph Carter <email@example.com> wrote:
> Either the GPL needs to change (VERY unlikely), the FSF needs to
> publish a new license which is more friendly to things which are Free
> Software but not GPL, or someone else needs to do it and TRY to get
> people to use it.
> Somehow all of these options don't seem to go very far in my mind,
> but one of them has to happen if we want to stop this license
Er.. I don't think a "one true way" is pursuing here. People will always
have differing goals, and what you're calling "this license fragmentation"
is really just a symptom of "goal fragmentation".